This manual, the infamous KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation, dated July , is the source of much of the material in the second manual. KUBARK. Its purpose is to provide guidelines for KUBARK interrogation, and particularly the counterintelligence interrogation of resistant sources. This page report, classified Secret, was drafted in July as a comprehensive guide for training interrogators in the art of obtaining.
|Published (Last):||13 November 2013|
|PDF File Size:||7.89 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
U.S. Army and CIA interrogation manuals – Wikipedia
A seems to be pretty angry with you — feels that you got kibark into this jam. It usually happens that the source has a relatively large body of information that has little or no intelligence value and only a small collection of nuggets.
In the course of several sessions conducted without note-taking, the subject is likely to fall into the comfortable illusion that he is not talking for the record.
The former interrogatee is counterinteligence likely to be a future trouble-maker if during interrogation he was subjected kubadk a form of compulsion imposed from outside himself. He may also be a Don Juan. But if rapport has been established, the interrogatee will be quick to sense and resent this change of attitude.
The interrogator also chooses the emotional key or keys in which the interrogation or any part of it will be played.
Government, tasked with gathering, processing and analyzing national security information from around the world, primarily through the use of human intelligence HUMINT.
If he makes exorbitant requests, an unimportant favor may provide a satisfactory substitute because the demand arises not from a specific need but as an kubatk of the subject’s need for security. Suspects should be held incommunicado and should be deprived of any kind of normal routine in eating and sleeping.
And he can create and amplify an effect of omniscience in a number of ways. But I hate to release one of you before the other; you ought to get out at the same time.
From this point of view an interrogation can be deemed successful if a source who is actually a hostile agent can report to the opposition only the kunark fields of our interest but cannot pinpoint specifics without including misleading information.
KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation
It’s a little bit down on that page, and don’t be surprised that every footer and header has secret crossed out, and that page to page has words, paragraphs or entire sections that are still redacted. In either event he seeks constantly some proof or external indication that the guilt of others is greater than his own. He may direct a desire for revenge inward, upon himself; in extreme cases suicide may result.
Nathan Espinoza rated it really liked it Oct 11, Some recommendations are very specific. Despite all planning efforts to select an interrogator whose age, background, skills, personality, and experience make him the best choice for the job, it sometimes happens that both questioner and subject feel, when they first meet, an immediate attraction or antipathy which is so strong that a change of interrogators quickly becomes essential. The success of good interrogators depends in large measure upon their use, conscious or not, of these principles and of processes and techniques deriving from them.
Compulsive gamblers who find no real pleasure in winning but do find relief in losing belong to this class. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 20 business days, as the statute requires.
It is not easy to distinguish between innocent blocks — things held back for reasons of personal prestige — and guilty blocks — things the interrogator needs to know. You should never hazard the important question until you have laid the foundation for it in such a way that, when confronted with the fact, the witness can neither deny nor explain it. Or the witnesses’ remarks about the known spy, edited as necessary, can be so played back that the interrogatee is persuaded that he is the subject of the remarks.
He should have on paper or firmly in mind all the questions to which he seeks answers.
John Wimmer rated it coumterintelligence was amazing Oct 16, The initial advantage lies with the interrogator. He sometimes gratifies his feeling of secret superiority by provoking unjust treatment. In the name of defending democracy, the manuals advocate profoundly undemocratic methods. But the assumption of hostility kybark or at least the use of pressure tactics at the first encounter — may make difficult subjects even out of those who would respond to recognition of individuality and an initial assumption of good will.
Why a Draft Would Weaken the U. A distinction should be kubakr as soon as possible between sources who will be sent to [approx.
Has a quit-claim been obtained?
An overstuffed chair for the use of the interrogatee is sometimes preferable to a straight-backed, wooden chair because if he is made to stand for a lengthy period or is otherwise deprived of physical comfort, the contrast is intensified and increased disorientation results.